Buy Healthy Peptides is an independent reference site about peptides. We do not sell peptides. This page sets out how our pages are researched, written, checked and corrected, so you can judge how much weight to give them.
Last reviewed: 16 September 2026.
How a page gets made
Our pages are researched and drafted with an automated editorial pipeline built on Anthropic’s Claude models, then checked against an automated quality gate and reviewed by our editor before publication. We say this openly because you should know how the words in front of you were produced.
What the pipeline is not allowed to do matters more than what it is. It researches from primary sources on every run and may cite only sources it has actually opened — never a reference recalled from training data, and never a citation assembled from a plausible-looking title. Where a claim cannot be verified against a source in that run, the claim is cut rather than hedged.
The sources we work from are primary: PubMed and PubMed Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, the FDA including DailyMed and Drugs@FDA, the European Medicines Agency, the Federal Register, the World Anti-Doping Agency for sports status, and peer-reviewed journals. Vendor marketing material, forum posts and other affiliate sites are not sources.
Review before publication
Every compound page, guide, comparison and vendor review is held for human review and published only after our editor has approved it. Timely news items are the one exception: they publish automatically once they pass the same automated checks, and are reviewed shortly afterwards. Anything that fails the automated checks cannot publish at all — it is held as a draft with its failures listed for a human to resolve.
What the quality gate checks
- A minimum number of primary-source references per page, with inline citation markers tied to a reference list
- That the evidence level of every finding is labelled — human randomised trial, human observational, animal, or in vitro — and that animal or test-tube results are never presented as human outcomes
- That regulatory statements carry the month they were checked
- That no page claims a compound treats, cures, prevents or diagnoses a disease
- That no page contains self-administration content: no injection instructions, no personal dosing schedules, no preparation guidance, no combination protocols
- That risks and side effects are present and given no less prominence than potential benefits
- That affiliate links appear only for vendors on our approved list, and that any page containing one carries its disclosure
What we will not publish
- Dosing or administration instructions. We will report the doses used in a named published study, or the official label dosing of an approved drug, attributed to its source. We will not tell you what to take or how to take it.
- Disease claims. We describe what studies found. We do not claim that a compound treats or prevents anything.
- Invented anything. No fabricated citations, study results, laboratory results, prices, coupon codes, customer reviews, testimonials or star ratings. If we have not seen it, it does not go on the page.
- Safety by implication. We do not imply that an unapproved compound is safe or legal for human use. Most compounds covered here are sold for laboratory research only and are not approved for human use in the United States.
- Paid coverage. No sponsored posts, no guest posts, no paid placement, no paid rankings. See our affiliate disclosure.
How we score things
Where we compare compounds or vendors, we score them against a rubric published in full on our comparison framework page. The axes describe properties of the molecule and the state of its evidence — not how well it works, and not whether you should buy it. Every score carries a one-line justification and a citation, and we publish no overall score, no composite and no star ratings, because an overall number is a verdict rather than a description.
Corrections and updates
Peptide science and peptide regulation both move quickly, and some of what is accurate today will not be in a year. Regulatory statements are date-stamped so you can see how fresh they are, and pages are re-checked when a compound’s status changes or significant new evidence is published.
If you find an error — a misread study, a stale regulatory statement, a citation that does not support the claim attached to it — we would like to hear about it, and we correct rather than quietly delete. Where a correction materially changes what a page said, we note it on the page.
Independence
We are not a pharmacy, a compounder, a vendor or a clinic, and we have no ownership relationship with any peptide seller. Our intended revenue is affiliate commission on vendor links, disclosed on every page that carries one and explained on our affiliate disclosure page. That revenue does not influence our scores, our coverage or how we describe risk.
This is not medical advice
Everything on this site is published for information and research context only. It is not medical advice, not a diagnosis and not a recommendation to use any compound. Peptides discussed here can carry real risks, interact with medicines and be prohibited in competitive sport. Talk to a qualified healthcare professional about your own situation before acting on anything you read here or anywhere else.